The Nimbus 16 asics gel shoes (2E) is my current shoe and was chosen based upon the Asics website "Shoe Finder". While I admit it fits great, but for the fact that the inside rear lining has torn (second pair in a row) right at the heel, I'm wondering when all is said and done, whether it be the Kayano 21, the Nimbus 16 or another shoe brand what one running shoe (or couple shoes) would Solereview feel is the best option for an Underpronator who needs a cushiony and somewhat wide shoe?I came to running in midlife having never run before. I started with the Asics 2160, which I loved. I had two pairs of those before I couldn't find them anymore.

I went to the Asics 2170, which were alright, but not like the 2160. I then went to the GT-2000 which again, were alright, but nothing to brag about. I took the plunge to the more expensive Kayano 20 and I loved them. It was the first time since the 2160 that I really was impressed by a running shoe. I went through three pairs asics gel venture 6 mens in one year. I nursed along my third pair waiting for the Kayano 21 to come out, and I bought a pair when they arrived.What a fantastic page! I'm returning to running after a long spell of rest  the impact was jarring an old neck injury and causing too much pain.

Got burning sensation, swelling in my toe and asics gel torrance all over the foot after running. Consulted a podiatrist and came to know I have heel spur. And may be wrong shoe type causing burning sensation. She advices to go with Asics Kayano or GT3000. Or Saucony Guide 8 or Omni. Tried Kayano 21 and 20 in a store and I felt Kayano 20 is softer than 21. Not sure which one to pick. Please let me know which one would be the right choice. I am a moderate over pronator.Physio: The picture demonstrates heavy supination contact, this is normal and the difference now is that you do not over pronate to compensate.

I agree, mizuno uppers don't last long as they are so minimalist. If this is a problem and you require asics gt 2000 6 womens width, I would also suggest Brook's transcend or Ravenna, new balance  the model you have mentioned (860) is fine, I would avoid the fresh foam, or asics  try the ds trainer version.So Adrenaline 15 first. Tried a UK size 10 2E, my usual size is 9.5, but general consensus that you need half a size up in this years model. A very snug fit and the arch support was instantly prominent, but not as bad as the GT-2000 and it actually felt in the right place on this shoe unlike the GT-2000 to me.

But in the end, the doubts of the Brooks (fit and arch) wouldn't go away and I really couldn't fault the New Balance. Having worn 2E New Balance in the past, I suppose it was logical that their shoe would be the one I ended up choosing.Hi, Thanks for all the great reviews on shoes, makes for interesting reading. I am currently training for a marathon in a couple months. Having run a few halfs my PB is 1hr34 and im weighing about 84kgs and 6ft4. I have two pairs of shoes, Nike Lunareclipse 2s and Adidas Boston Boost 5s. I find the LE2s better for longer runs as they slightly more comfortable, but get a slight pain in right knee, but my feet are relatively okay after a longer run(20km plus).

If you are used to the Asics fit (especially when using the aftermarket orthoses) makes sense to stick to that brand. If you find the 21 too soft, you could either look for the Kayano 20 (should be asics gt 2000 4 women's available on massive markdown) or the GT 2000 3. Do you need to upsize on width from a 16? We don't know, but we suggest you try out the standard Kayano 21 and then take a call.Hey there! Amazing site- I find your reviews absolutely amazing- keep up the good work =ØBÞ I find myself somewhat torn, however and could use some advice. I'm a relative amateur- I only started running at the beginning of 2015, but I am planning on completing my first half marathon in the next couple of months and my first marathon in early-mid 2016.